Gachoki v. Ashcroft

75 F. App'x 920
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2003·No. No. 03-1301·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Catherine N. Gachoki, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Gachoki, No. A75-843-584 (B.I.A. Feb. 13, 2003); see also 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(3), 1208.16(b)(l)(i)(B), (c)(3)(ii) (2003) (providing that an alien is not eligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture if internal relocation is a reasonable option). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gachoki v. Ashcroft, 75 F. App'x 920 (4th Cir. 2003).

75 F. App'x 920 (Gachoki v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related