Gabriele v. Commissioner of Social Security

Sixth Circuit

Gabriele v. Commissioner of Social Security

53 F. App'x 358

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 2002

DocketNo. 01-2579

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. App'x 358 (Gabriele v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gabriele v. Commissioner of Social Security, 53 F. App'x 358 (6th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Tawny R. Gabriele, through counsel, appeals a district court judgment that affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of her application for social security disability benefits. The parties have expressly waived oral argument pursuant to Rule 34(j)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and we agree that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting judgment in favor of the Commissioner. Judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision is limited to determining whether the Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the proper legal standards were employed. Garcia v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 46 F.3d 552, 555 (6th Cir.1995). No basis for reversal may be gleaned from a review of the briefs, the administrative record, or the district court’s statement of reasons.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated on the record by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Tawny R. Gabriele, through counsel, appeals a district court judgment that affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of her application for social security disability benefits. The parties have expressly waived oral argument pursuant to Rule 34(j)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and we agree that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting judgment in favor of the Commissioner. Judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision is limited to determining whether the Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the proper legal standards were employed. Garcia v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 46 F.3d 552, 555 (6th Cir.1995). No basis for reversal may be gleaned from a review of the briefs, the administrative record, or the district court’s statement of reasons.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated on the record by the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F. App'x 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriele-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca6-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack