Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras
This text of Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras (Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00610-CV
Gabriela Castro, Appellant
v.
Jessie Contreras, Appellee
FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-FM-20-001612, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Gabriela Castro filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s final and
appealable judgment denying her petition to adopt a child. Appellee Jessie Contreras filed a
“Motion to Abate and Require Appellant to Obtain Reporter’s Record and Motion to Affirm
Without Reporter’s Record.” Contreras requests that we give Castro notice and an opportunity to
cure the lack of a reporter’s record, as required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.3, and
if she does not, Contreras requests that we affirm the trial court’s judgment without a reporter’s
record. To date, Castro has not responded to the motion.
On the docketing statement that Castro filed with the Court, she indicated that there
was no reporter’s record and that no reporter’s record was requested and no payment arrangements
were made with the reporter. In addition to his motion, Contreras has submitted a letter to this
Court indicating that his counsel confirmed with the official court reporter that a record was made
on the following dates: November 9, 2020, November 10, 2020, November 12, 2020, November 16, 2020, January 20, 2021, February 27, 2021, and June 4, 2021. Castro has filed her
appellant’s brief, and Contreras asserts that a reporter’s record is necessary to determine certain
issues presented in Castro’s brief. In particular, Castro asserts in her first issue that the trial court
abused its discretion by failing to hold a final hearing on her petition to adopt and in her second
issue that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her petition to adopt. From the clerk’s
record, it appears that the trial court conducted a final bench trial in November 2020 and orally
rendered judgment on January 20, 2021, followed by several subsequent hearings before it signed
an order denying Castro’s petition to adopt on August 27, 2021.
We grant the motion in part. We abate this appeal to allow Castro time to cure her
failure to file the reporter’s record. Castro shall submit either a motion to reinstate once the
reporter’s record has been filed or a status report concerning the status of the reporter’s record on or
before May 9, 2022. Failure to file the reporter’s record or a status report may result in the Court
considering the appeal without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3 (“[T]he appellate
court may—after first giving the appellant notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure—consider
and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision.”). The
appeal will remain abated until further order of this Court.
It is so ordered on April 8, 2022.
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Abated
Filed: April 8, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriela-castro-v-jessie-contreras-texapp-2022.