Gabriel v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Gabriel v. United States

65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2993

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 2, 1895·Published

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This article is a white, dry material, for use in painting, containing zinc, but not containing lead. Para- , graph 60 of the tariff act of 1890 provides for a duty on “white paint containing zinc, but not containing lead; dry,” and “ground in oil.” This seems to be the article of that paragraph, dry, which in common speech is called “paint,” although not usable as such until it is mixed with oil. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

This article is a white, dry material, for use in painting, containing zinc, but not containing lead. Para- , graph 60 of the tariff act of 1890 provides for a duty on “white paint containing zinc, but not containing lead; dry,” and “ground in oil.” This seems to be the article of that paragraph, dry, which in common speech is called “paint,” although not usable as such until it is mixed with oil. Decision affirmed.

Gabriel v. United States, 65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2993 (circtsdny 1895).

Pincite

65 F. 422 (Gabriel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.