Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P. Gas Service, Inc.

104 A.D.3d 1262, 960 N.Y.S.2d 691

This text of 104 A.D.3d 1262 (Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P. Gas Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P. Gas Service, Inc., 104 A.D.3d 1262, 960 N.Y.S.2d 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Motion or reargument of the appeal is granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the opinion and order entered June 15, 2012 (98 AD3d 168 [2012]) is amended by deleting the ordering paragraph and substituting the following ordering paragraph: “It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the third ordering paragraph and granting those parts of plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order permitting the undeposed plaintiffs who have returned to Guatemala to be deposed in Guatemala via video conference and permitting the plaintiffs who have returned to Mexico and Guatemala to testify at trial by video and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.” The opinion and order is further amended by inserting the following sentence after the first sentence of section IV: “Nevertheless, we exercise our power to reach that issue (see generally Bracken v Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth., 251 AD2d 1068, 1069 [1998]), and we conclude that the court erred in determining that those medical examinations must be conducted in the United States inasmuch as no such examinations have been requested (see generally Murad v Russo, 74 AD3d 1823, 1824 [2010], Iv dismissed 16 NY3d 732 [2011]; Burnett v Columbus McKinnon Corp., 69 AD3d 58, 64 [2009]).” The opinion and order is further amended by inserting the words “of plaintiffs’ contention with respect to the video depositions” after the words “[w]e now turn to the merits” in section IV(A) (2). The opinion and order is further amended by deleting the words “that part of’ and “concerning the depositions of plaintiffs” from the sentence in section VI. Present— Smith, J.E, Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burnett v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.
69 A.D.3d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Murad v. Russo
74 A.D.3d 1823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Bracken v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority
251 A.D.2d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 1262, 960 N.Y.S.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriel-v-johnstons-lp-gas-service-inc-nyappdiv-2013.