Gabriel Lopez v. State
This text of Gabriel Lopez v. State (Gabriel Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-12-00713-CR & 13-12-00714-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
GABRIEL LOPEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Gabriel Lopez, attempts to appeal a conviction for theft arising from
trial court cause number 2012-DCR-1403-D, docketed in our Court as cause number
13-12-00713-CR, and a conviction for burglary of vehicles arising from trial court cause
number 2012-DCR-2065-D, docketed in our Court as cause number 13-12-00714-CR.
In each of these cases, the trial court has certified that the defendant has waived the
right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 4, 2012, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s
certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the records; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal in either cause; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter,
counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise
this Court as to the existence of any amended certifications.
On December 14, 2012, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court for each of
these causes. Counsel’s response does not establish: (1) that the certifications
currently on file with this Court are incorrect, or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right
to appeal in either cause.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right
of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly,
these appeals are DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 31st day of January, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gabriel Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriel-lopez-v-state-texapp-2013.