Gabriel Building Co. v. State Ex Rel. Birrell
This text of 186 N.E. 5 (Gabriel Building Co. v. State Ex Rel. Birrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question for determination in this case is whether Section 13195-1, General Code, known as the “Padlock Act,” is constitutional. The Ohio statute above referred to is so nearly identical with the national prohibition law on the same subject that we are constrained to follow the decisions of the United States Supreme Court which have declared the national law to be constitutional. Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S., 623; Lewisohn v. United States, 258 U. S., 630; Grossfield v. United States, 276 U. S., 494.
The petition in error will therefore be dismissed.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 N.E. 5, 125 Ohio St. 642, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 642, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabriel-building-co-v-state-ex-rel-birrell-ohio-1932.