Gabriel Almanza-Arenas V.loretta E. Lynch

Ninth Circuit

Gabriel Almanza-Arenas V.loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2015·No. 09-73715·Published

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION MAY 08 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL ALMANZA-ARENAS, No. 09-71415 Petitioner, Agency No. A078-755-092

v.

ORDER

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

GABRIEL ALMANZA-ARENAS, No. 10-73715 Petitioner, Agency No. A078-755-092 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION MAY 08 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL ALMANZA-ARENAS, No. 09-71415 Petitioner, Agency No. A078-755-092

v.

ORDER

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

GABRIEL ALMANZA-ARENAS, No. 10-73715 Petitioner, Agency No. A078-755-092 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Gabriel Almanza-Arenas V.loretta E. Lynch, (9th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Gabriel Almanza-Arenas V.loretta E. Lynch (Gabriel Almanza-Arenas V.loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.