Gable v. Remington Arms Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Gable v. Remington Arms Co.

510 A.2d 153, 97 Pa. Commw. 180, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2230

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 12, 1986

DocketAppeal, No. 53 T.D. 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 A.2d 153 (Gable v. Remington Arms Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gable v. Remington Arms Co., 510 A.2d 153, 97 Pa. Commw. 180, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2230 (Pa. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

' Remington Arms Company, Inc. appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, which sustained the objections of the Department of Transportation (DOT) to discovery requests. We reverse.

Theresa Hughes was fatally injured in an automobile accident, which occurred while she was operating a tractor trailer. Al Gable, the administrator of her estate, filed a complaint against Fruehauf Corporation, the manufacturer of the trailer, and Remington Arms Company, which loaded the trailer. Remington Arms filed a complaint joining DOT as an additional defendant. That complaint averred that the accident was the result of DOTs negligent supervision, maintenance and control of a dangerous and hazardous condition existing at a point on the highway where the accident occurred.

At a deposition, a DOT traffic engineer was questioned about certain accident records and reports kept by DOT regarding the area in which the accident occurred. DOT objected to the questioning or discovery of any accident data, records, or accident studies associated with the in-depth accident investigations kept by DOT. The trial court held that section 3754(b) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §3754(b), bars discovery of studies and investigations of accidents prepared by DOT, because of the confidential nature of such studies. Pursuant to a petition filed by Remington Arms, the trial court amended its order to certify this matter for an interlocutory appeal.

[182]*182Section 3754(b) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §3754(b), provides, “Information, records and reports associated with in-depth accident investigations shall not be admissible as evidence in any legal action or other proceeding....” In Shoyer v. City of Philadelphia, 96 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 75, 506 A.2d 522 (1986), this court ruled on the question of whether section 3754(b) bars discovery of such documents. There, this court held that section 3754(b), while not allowing the admission of such records into evidence, does not prohibit discovery of records and reports associated with in-depth accident investigations.

Accordingly, we must reverse the trial court.

Order

Now, May 12, 1986, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County entered at No. 1981-C-3139, dated June 17, 1983, is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

' Remington Arms Company, Inc. appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, which sustained the objections of the Department of Transportation (DOT) to discovery requests. We reverse.

Theresa Hughes was fatally injured in an automobile accident, which occurred while she was operating a tractor trailer. Al Gable, the administrator of her estate, filed a complaint against Fruehauf Corporation, the manufacturer of the trailer, and Remington Arms Company, which loaded the trailer. Remington Arms filed a complaint joining DOT as an additional defendant. That complaint averred that the accident was the result of DOTs negligent supervision, maintenance and control of a dangerous and hazardous condition existing at a point on the highway where the accident occurred.

At a deposition, a DOT traffic engineer was questioned about certain accident records and reports kept by DOT regarding the area in which the accident occurred. DOT objected to the questioning or discovery of any accident data, records, or accident studies associated with the in-depth accident investigations kept by DOT. The trial court held that section 3754(b) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §3754(b), bars discovery of studies and investigations of accidents prepared by DOT, because of the confidential nature of such studies. Pursuant to a petition filed by Remington Arms, the trial court amended its order to certify this matter for an interlocutory appeal.

[182]*182Section 3754(b) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. §3754(b), provides, “Information, records and reports associated with in-depth accident investigations shall not be admissible as evidence in any legal action or other proceeding....” In Shoyer v. City of Philadelphia, 96 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 75, 506 A.2d 522 (1986), this court ruled on the question of whether section 3754(b) bars discovery of such documents. There, this court held that section 3754(b), while not allowing the admission of such records into evidence, does not prohibit discovery of records and reports associated with in-depth accident investigations.

Accordingly, we must reverse the trial court.

Order

Now, May 12, 1986, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County entered at No. 1981-C-3139, dated June 17, 1983, is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 A.2d 153, 97 Pa. Commw. 180, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gable-v-remington-arms-co-pacommwct-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack