Gabel v. Time Insurance

478 P.2d 368, 257 Or. 241, 1970 Ore. LEXIS 271
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1970·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

O’CONNELL, C.J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant covering loss resulting from accidental bodily injury. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff injured his back as a result of a fall from the roof of a house. He sought recovery from defendant under its policy for disability resulting from this injury.

Defendant interposed an affirmative defense, alleging that plaintiff had represented in his application for insurance that he had not had any disease or disorder of the circulatory system when in fact he was, at that time, afflicted with Buerger’s Disease (which is a circulatory disease). It was further alleged that this misrepresentation was relied upon by defendant and that it was material to the issuance of the policy.

Plaintiff’s reply set up an estoppel against defendant, alleging that the application form was filled out by defendant’s agent and that although plaintiff made a full disclosure of his disease to defendant’s [243]*243agent, the latter inserted the incorrect answer after representing to plaintiff that the information sought by the question was irrelevant under the circumstances.

The trial court, relying upon Comer v. World Insurance Co., 212 Or 105, 318 P2d 916 (1957), sustained defendant’s demurrer to the reply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gabel v. Time Insurance, 478 P.2d 368, 257 Or. 241, 1970 Ore. LEXIS 271 (Or. 1970).

478 P.2d 368 (Gabel v. Time Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaskiewicz v. Walton
549 A.2d 774 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Brown v. Vogt
538 P.2d 362 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1975)
Wells v. Bank of Nevada
522 P.2d 1014 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1974)