Gabel v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Gabel v. Johnson

987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 171, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1098

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 16, 1999

Docket97-05-28767M; CA A99804

StatusPublished

This text of 987 P.2d 526 (Gabel v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gabel v. Johnson, 987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 171, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1098 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, the state appeals a judgment ordering it to release plaintiff from incarceration. The state contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the Board of Pairóle and Post-Prison Supervision lacked sufficient evidence to determine that plaintiff suffered from a present severe emotional disturbance that rendered him a danger to the health or safety of the community, so as to postpone his parole release date under ORS 144.125(3).

After the case was decided by the trial court and submitted on appeal, we decided Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178 (1999), which holds that the disposition on this issue turns on the extent to which the board’s decision was controlled by OAR 255-060-0006 (1988). Unfortunately, neither the briefing nor the record enables us to determine whether that or a similar rule is applicable.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus proceeding, the state appeals a judgment ordering it to release plaintiff from incarceration. The state contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the Board of Pairóle and Post-Prison Supervision lacked sufficient evidence to determine that plaintiff suffered from a present severe emotional disturbance that rendered him a danger to the health or safety of the community, so as to postpone his parole release date under ORS 144.125(3).

After the case was decided by the trial court and submitted on appeal, we decided Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178 (1999), which holds that the disposition on this issue turns on the extent to which the board’s decision was controlled by OAR 255-060-0006 (1988). Unfortunately, neither the briefing nor the record enables us to determine whether that or a similar rule is applicable.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 171, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabel-v-johnson-orctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack