Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")

Eleventh Circuit

Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")

131 F.3d 950, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 41403, 1997 WL 767336

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 1997

Docket96-2307

StatusPublished

Cited by45 cases

This text of 131 F.3d 950 (Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic"), 131 F.3d 950, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 41403, 1997 WL 767336 (11th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Rule 35, Fed.R.App.P.; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

On panel rehearing, the- last two sentences (including footnote 7) of the opinion are hereby deleted, and the following sentence is substituted in lieu thereof:

For the reason discussed above, the record conclusively established that Kairnowitz was not entitled in this suit to the unrelated preliminary injunction he sought, and thus it was clear that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED in all respects except for the foregoing-amendment of the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI