Gabaryaahla and Akiva Israel Living Estate v. MidFirst Bank

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

GABARYAAHLA ISRAEL and ) AKIVA ISRAEL, Beneficiaries, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-1255-D ) MIDFIRST BANK, et. al., ) ) Defendants. )

Order Before the Court is the Motion for Relief from Local Rule Requiring Association of Local Counsel [Doc. No. 13] and The Trump Organization’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14]. Defendant, The Trump Organization, filed both motions on February 11, 2025. Plaintiff has since filed a Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 16]. The Second Amended Complaint does not name The Trump Organization as a defendant. Furthermore, the Second Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff’s prior pleadings and renders them of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Miller v. Glanz, 948 F.2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991). Consequently, The Trump Organization is no longer a defendant in this case. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Relief from Local Rule Requiring Association of Counsel [Doc No. 14] and The Trump Organization’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 15] are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4" day of March 2025.

Ny Q.OyPt TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge