GABAREE v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

GABAREE v. State

363 S.W.3d 113, 2012 WL 43001, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 15

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in GABAREE v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1156 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 2012·No. WD 72631·Published

Opinion

*114 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Gabaree appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to improper bolstering and to propensity evidence and for failing to impeach one of the victims. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*114 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Gabaree appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to improper bolstering and to propensity evidence and for failing to impeach one of the victims. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

GABAREE v. State, 363 S.W.3d 113, 2012 WL 43001, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 15 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

363 S.W.3d 113 (GABAREE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.