G. W. Thompson & Co. v. Miller

1 White & W. 623
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided June 22, 1881·No. No. 2031, Op. Book No. 2, p. 370·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1109. Opinion of ivitness not competent to prove damage. In an attachment suit, a witness for defendant ■was permitted to testify, over objections made by plaintiff, that, in the opinion of witness, the defendant had been damaged $1,000 by reason of the suing out of the attachment. Held, that this was error for which the judgment must be reversed. The opinion of a witness as to the amount of damage sustained is not admissible. The general rule which pervades all our law is, that the witness is to testify only to facts; his opinion is not to be given, for it is the opinion of the jury on the testimony which forms the verdict and decides the case. [Clardy v. Callicoate, 24 Tex. 172; 2 N. Y. 514; 2 Allen, 428; 2 Sedgwick on Dam. 632.]

Eeversed and remanded

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. W. Thompson & Co. v. Miller, 1 White & W. 623 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

1 White & W. 623 (G. W. Thompson & Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morehouse v. . Mathews
2 N.Y. 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1849)