1 T. Kennedy Helm, IV (SBN 282319) Kevin G. Little (SBN 149818) HELM LAW OFFICE, PC Michelle L. Tostenrude (SBN 290121) 2 644 40th Street, Suite 305 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN G. LITTLE Oakland, California 94609 Post Office Box 8656 3 Telephone: (510) 350-7517 Fresno, California 93747 Facsimile: (510) 350-7359 Telephone: (559) 342-5800 4 E-mail: kennedy@helmlawoffice.com Facsimile: (559) 242-2400 E-Mail: kevin@kevinglittle.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs A.G. and F.G., by and through their guardian ad litem, Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan Attorneys for Plaintiff Rosa Madrid
6 Gary L. Logan (SBN 90558) Lindsey M. Romano (SBN 337600) Alan J. Mish (SBN 105771 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 7 LAW OFFICES OF 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 LEBEAU • THELEN, LLP San Francisco, CA 94111 8 5001 East Commercenter Drive, Suite 300 Telephone: (415) 875-4126 Post Office Box 12092 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 9 Bakersfield, California 93389-2092 E-mail: lromano@grsm.com Telephone:(661) 325-8962 10 Facsimile: (661) 325-1127 Attorneys for Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Alla E-mail: glogan@lebeauthelen.com Liberstein, M.D.; and Andrew P. Ho, M.D. 11 E-mail: amish@lebeauthelen.com
12 Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare, Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 FRESNO DIVISION 16 A.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem ) Case No. 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO 17 Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan, individually and as co- ) Case No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO successor in interest to Decedent Francisco Ponce, Jr.; ) 18 F.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO: (1) Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan, individually and as co- ) CONSOLIDATE CASES PURSUANT TO 19 successor in interest to Decedent Francisco Ponce, Jr.; ) FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE individually, ) 42(a); AND (2) MODIFY EXISTING 20 ) SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 19) Plaintiffs, ) 21 vs. ) ) 22 COUNTY OF TULARE, a public entity; Correctional ) Deputy Trainee JOSE SANCHEZ PEREZ; ) Correctional Deputy JAMES DILLON; Correctional ) 23 Deputy RODRIGO DEOCHOA; WELLPATH, LLC, a ) Delaware Corporation; ANDREW P. HO, MD; ALLA ) 24 LIBERSTEIN, MD; and DOES 7–50, jointly and ) severally, ) 25 ) Defendants. ) 26 ) ) 27 ) 1 Plaintiffs A.G. and F.G., by and through their counsel, T. Kennedy Helm, IV, of Helm 2 Law Office, PC; Plaintiff Rosa Madrid, by and through her counsel, Kevin G. Little of the Law 3 Office of Kevin G. Little; Defendants County of Tulare, Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and 4 Rodrigo DeOchoa, by and through their counsel, Gary L. Logan, of Lebeau Thelen, LLP; and 5 Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Andrew P. Ho, M.D.; and Alla Liberstein, M.D., by and through 6 their counsel Lindsey M. Romano of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, having met and 7 conferred, hereby respectfully stipulate and request as follows: 8 RECITALS 9 A. On December 6, 2023, this Court issued an order granting the Parties’ stipulation for 10 Plaintiffs to file a First Amended Complaint in A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 11 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO. See ECF No. 23. 12 B. The First Amended Complaint, filed December 6, 2023, added Tulare County defendants 13 Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa, and it also added defendants 14 Wellpath, LLC, and its employees Andrew P. Ho, M.D., and Alla Liberstein, M.D. See 15 ECF No. 24. 16 C. On December 27, 2023, Defendants Tulare County, Perez, Dillon, and DeOchoa 17 answered the First Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 27. 18 D. On February 2, 2024, Plaintiff Rosa Madrid filed a Complaint against Defendants Jose 19 Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa arising out of the same incident as in 20 A.G., the in-custody death of Francisco Ponce, Jr., See Rosa Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et 21 al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-HBK, at ECF No. 1. Counsel for Plaintiff Madrid also filed a 22 Notice of Related Cases regarding this case. See ECF No. 3 in Madrid. 23 E. On February 5, 2024, the A.G. Plaintiffs served the First Amended Complaint on 24 defendants Wellpath, LLC and Alla Liberstein, M.D. See ECF Nos. 28, 29. The 25 responsive pleading date was February 26, 2024. 26 F. On February 20, 2024, the same counsel for Defendants Sanchez Perez, Dillon, and 27 DeOchoa as in A.G. filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint in Madrid. See ECF No. 7. 1 G. On February 21, 2024, the A.G. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Related Cases regarding 2 Madrid. See ECF No. 30. 3 H. On February 23, 2024, counsel for Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Alla Liberstein, M.D.; 4 and Andrew P. Ho, M.D.; filed a notice of appearance in A.G. See ECF no. 31. 5 I. Also on February 23, 2024, counsel for the Wellpath defendants and counsel for 6 Plaintiffs in A.G., after meeting and conferring, filed a stipulation pursuant to Eastern 7 District Local Rule 144(a) that the Wellpath defendants would file a responsive pleading 8 to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint by March 25, 2024. See ECF No. 34. 9 J. Also on February 23, 2024, Plaintiffs served the First Amended Complaint on defendant 10 Dr. Ho. See ECF No. 35. 11 K. Also on February 23, 2024, District Judge Thurston entered an order relating Madrid to 12 A.G. and reassigning both cases to District Judge Thurston and this Court. See ECF No. 8 13 in Madrid. 14 L. Also on February 23, 2024, this Court reset a scheduling conference in Madrid for May 15 14, 2024. See ECF No. 9 in Madrid. 16 M. The Parties agree that the cases of A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 1:23-cv- 17 00500-JLT-SKO and Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO, 18 “involve overlapping parties, claims, events and/or questions of factor law. Both actions 19 concern the death of Francisco Ponce, Jr., while confined in the Bob Wiley Detention 20 Facility.” See ECF No. 8 in Madrid. The Plaintiffs in A.G. are Mr. Ponce’s two minor 21 daughters and co-successors in interest, and the Plaintiff in Madrid is Mr. Ponce’s 22 mother. 23 N. The Parties also agree that these cases should be consolidated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), for 24 discovery, pretrial, and trial, proceeding under one Scheduling Order. 25 O. Therefore, the Parties stipulate and request that the cases be consolidated, and that the 26 current scheduling order in A.G., ECF No. 19, be modified. 27 1 P. When an act must be done within a specified time, the Court may, for good cause, extend 2 the time with or without motion if the court acts, or a request is made, before the original 3 time expires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). With respect to an order setting forth the Court’s 4 pretrial schedule, the “court may modify the pretrial schedule ‘if it cannot be reasonably 5 met despite the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.’” Johnson v. Mammoth 6 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). The Parties respectfully submit that 7 good cause exists to continue the deadline for completion of fact discovery and the 8 successive deadlines. 9 Q. Currently, the cutoff for non-expert discovery in A.G. is May 8, 2024. See ECF No. 19. 10 R. Counsel for the A.G. Plaintiffs, counsel for the Tulare County Defendants, and counsel 11 for the Wellpath Defendants have met-and-conferred and do not believe that fact 12 discovery can be completed in A.G. by the current deadline of May 8, 2024, because the 13 Wellpath Defendants will file their responsive pleading by March 25, 2024. 14 S. Therefore, the A.G. Parties have agreed that a stipulated extension of approximately 180 15 days of the cutoff for fact discovery will allow the Parties to complete fact discovery. 16 T. The A.G.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 T. Kennedy Helm, IV (SBN 282319) Kevin G. Little (SBN 149818) HELM LAW OFFICE, PC Michelle L. Tostenrude (SBN 290121) 2 644 40th Street, Suite 305 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN G. LITTLE Oakland, California 94609 Post Office Box 8656 3 Telephone: (510) 350-7517 Fresno, California 93747 Facsimile: (510) 350-7359 Telephone: (559) 342-5800 4 E-mail: kennedy@helmlawoffice.com Facsimile: (559) 242-2400 E-Mail: kevin@kevinglittle.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs A.G. and F.G., by and through their guardian ad litem, Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan Attorneys for Plaintiff Rosa Madrid
6 Gary L. Logan (SBN 90558) Lindsey M. Romano (SBN 337600) Alan J. Mish (SBN 105771 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 7 LAW OFFICES OF 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 LEBEAU • THELEN, LLP San Francisco, CA 94111 8 5001 East Commercenter Drive, Suite 300 Telephone: (415) 875-4126 Post Office Box 12092 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 9 Bakersfield, California 93389-2092 E-mail: lromano@grsm.com Telephone:(661) 325-8962 10 Facsimile: (661) 325-1127 Attorneys for Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Alla E-mail: glogan@lebeauthelen.com Liberstein, M.D.; and Andrew P. Ho, M.D. 11 E-mail: amish@lebeauthelen.com
12 Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare, Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 FRESNO DIVISION 16 A.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem ) Case No. 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO 17 Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan, individually and as co- ) Case No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO successor in interest to Decedent Francisco Ponce, Jr.; ) 18 F.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO: (1) Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan, individually and as co- ) CONSOLIDATE CASES PURSUANT TO 19 successor in interest to Decedent Francisco Ponce, Jr.; ) FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE individually, ) 42(a); AND (2) MODIFY EXISTING 20 ) SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 19) Plaintiffs, ) 21 vs. ) ) 22 COUNTY OF TULARE, a public entity; Correctional ) Deputy Trainee JOSE SANCHEZ PEREZ; ) Correctional Deputy JAMES DILLON; Correctional ) 23 Deputy RODRIGO DEOCHOA; WELLPATH, LLC, a ) Delaware Corporation; ANDREW P. HO, MD; ALLA ) 24 LIBERSTEIN, MD; and DOES 7–50, jointly and ) severally, ) 25 ) Defendants. ) 26 ) ) 27 ) 1 Plaintiffs A.G. and F.G., by and through their counsel, T. Kennedy Helm, IV, of Helm 2 Law Office, PC; Plaintiff Rosa Madrid, by and through her counsel, Kevin G. Little of the Law 3 Office of Kevin G. Little; Defendants County of Tulare, Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and 4 Rodrigo DeOchoa, by and through their counsel, Gary L. Logan, of Lebeau Thelen, LLP; and 5 Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Andrew P. Ho, M.D.; and Alla Liberstein, M.D., by and through 6 their counsel Lindsey M. Romano of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, having met and 7 conferred, hereby respectfully stipulate and request as follows: 8 RECITALS 9 A. On December 6, 2023, this Court issued an order granting the Parties’ stipulation for 10 Plaintiffs to file a First Amended Complaint in A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 11 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO. See ECF No. 23. 12 B. The First Amended Complaint, filed December 6, 2023, added Tulare County defendants 13 Jose Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa, and it also added defendants 14 Wellpath, LLC, and its employees Andrew P. Ho, M.D., and Alla Liberstein, M.D. See 15 ECF No. 24. 16 C. On December 27, 2023, Defendants Tulare County, Perez, Dillon, and DeOchoa 17 answered the First Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 27. 18 D. On February 2, 2024, Plaintiff Rosa Madrid filed a Complaint against Defendants Jose 19 Sanchez Perez, James Dillon, and Rodrigo DeOchoa arising out of the same incident as in 20 A.G., the in-custody death of Francisco Ponce, Jr., See Rosa Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et 21 al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-HBK, at ECF No. 1. Counsel for Plaintiff Madrid also filed a 22 Notice of Related Cases regarding this case. See ECF No. 3 in Madrid. 23 E. On February 5, 2024, the A.G. Plaintiffs served the First Amended Complaint on 24 defendants Wellpath, LLC and Alla Liberstein, M.D. See ECF Nos. 28, 29. The 25 responsive pleading date was February 26, 2024. 26 F. On February 20, 2024, the same counsel for Defendants Sanchez Perez, Dillon, and 27 DeOchoa as in A.G. filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint in Madrid. See ECF No. 7. 1 G. On February 21, 2024, the A.G. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Related Cases regarding 2 Madrid. See ECF No. 30. 3 H. On February 23, 2024, counsel for Defendants Wellpath, LLC; Alla Liberstein, M.D.; 4 and Andrew P. Ho, M.D.; filed a notice of appearance in A.G. See ECF no. 31. 5 I. Also on February 23, 2024, counsel for the Wellpath defendants and counsel for 6 Plaintiffs in A.G., after meeting and conferring, filed a stipulation pursuant to Eastern 7 District Local Rule 144(a) that the Wellpath defendants would file a responsive pleading 8 to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint by March 25, 2024. See ECF No. 34. 9 J. Also on February 23, 2024, Plaintiffs served the First Amended Complaint on defendant 10 Dr. Ho. See ECF No. 35. 11 K. Also on February 23, 2024, District Judge Thurston entered an order relating Madrid to 12 A.G. and reassigning both cases to District Judge Thurston and this Court. See ECF No. 8 13 in Madrid. 14 L. Also on February 23, 2024, this Court reset a scheduling conference in Madrid for May 15 14, 2024. See ECF No. 9 in Madrid. 16 M. The Parties agree that the cases of A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 1:23-cv- 17 00500-JLT-SKO and Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO, 18 “involve overlapping parties, claims, events and/or questions of factor law. Both actions 19 concern the death of Francisco Ponce, Jr., while confined in the Bob Wiley Detention 20 Facility.” See ECF No. 8 in Madrid. The Plaintiffs in A.G. are Mr. Ponce’s two minor 21 daughters and co-successors in interest, and the Plaintiff in Madrid is Mr. Ponce’s 22 mother. 23 N. The Parties also agree that these cases should be consolidated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), for 24 discovery, pretrial, and trial, proceeding under one Scheduling Order. 25 O. Therefore, the Parties stipulate and request that the cases be consolidated, and that the 26 current scheduling order in A.G., ECF No. 19, be modified. 27 1 P. When an act must be done within a specified time, the Court may, for good cause, extend 2 the time with or without motion if the court acts, or a request is made, before the original 3 time expires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). With respect to an order setting forth the Court’s 4 pretrial schedule, the “court may modify the pretrial schedule ‘if it cannot be reasonably 5 met despite the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.’” Johnson v. Mammoth 6 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). The Parties respectfully submit that 7 good cause exists to continue the deadline for completion of fact discovery and the 8 successive deadlines. 9 Q. Currently, the cutoff for non-expert discovery in A.G. is May 8, 2024. See ECF No. 19. 10 R. Counsel for the A.G. Plaintiffs, counsel for the Tulare County Defendants, and counsel 11 for the Wellpath Defendants have met-and-conferred and do not believe that fact 12 discovery can be completed in A.G. by the current deadline of May 8, 2024, because the 13 Wellpath Defendants will file their responsive pleading by March 25, 2024. 14 S. Therefore, the A.G. Parties have agreed that a stipulated extension of approximately 180 15 days of the cutoff for fact discovery will allow the Parties to complete fact discovery. 16 T. The A.G. Parties have further agreed that such a stipulated extension of 180 days of the 17 cutoff for fact discovery would necessitate an approximate 180-day extension of each of 18 the remaining pretrial dates, and of the trial date. 19 U. Should Madrid be consolidated with A.G., then counsel for Plaintiff in Madrid agrees that 20 the A.G. Scheduling Order, as modified below, should apply to the consolidated case. 21 STIPULATIONS 22 The Parties stipulate that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the cases of 23 A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO and Madrid v. Sanchez- 24 Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO, should be consolidated for discovery, pretrial dates, 25 and trial. Given the foregoing, and the current approaching non-expert discovery cutoff of May 26 8, 2024 (ECF No. 19), the Parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to continue the non- 27 expert discovery cutoff and the subsequent case deadlines by approximately 180 days each: 1 Matter Current Deadline (Doc. 19) New Deadline 2 Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff May 8, 2024 (W) November 6, 2024 (W) 3 Expert Disclosures June 12, 2024 (W) December 11, 2024(W) 4 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures July 17, 2024 (W) January 15, 2025 (W) 5 Expert Discovery Cutoff August 19, 2024 (M) February 17, 2025 (M) 6 Non-Dispositive Motion September 3, 2024 (Tu) March 4, 2025 (Tu) 7 Deadline-Filing 8 Non-Dispositive Motion October 16, 2024 (W) April 16, 2025 (W) 9 Deadline-Hearing 10 Dispositive Motion Deadline- September 18, 2024 (W) March 19, 2025 (W) 11 Filing 12 Dispositive Motion Deadline- October 28, 2024 (M) April 28, 2025 (M) 13 Hearing 14 Deadline to Provide Proposed December 4, 2024 (W) June 4, 2025 (W) 15 Settlement Conference Dates: 16 Pre-Trial Conference January 27, 2025, 1:30 p.m. (M) July 28, 2025, 1:30 pm 17 (M) 18 Trial March 18, 2025, 8:30 a.m. (Tu) September 16, 2025, 19 8:30 a.m. (Tu) 20
21 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 22 Respectfully Submitted, 23 Dated: March 1, 2024 HELM LAW OFFICE, PC 24
25 /s/ T. Kennedy Helm, IV T. KENNEDY HELM, IV 26 Attorney for Plaintiffs A.G. and F.G., by and through their guardian ad litem, Johana Yolanda Corral Galvan 27 1 Dated: March 1, 2024 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN G. LITTLE 2 /s/ Kevin G. Little* By: KEVIN G. LITTLE 3 Attorney for Plaintiff Rosa Madrid
4 Dated: March 1, 2024 LEBEAU THELEN LLP 5 /s/ Gary L. Logan* 6 By: GARY L. LOGAN 7 Attorneys for Tulare County Defendants
8 Dated: March 1, 2024 GORDON REES SCULLY MANASUKHANI, LLP 9 /s/ Lindsey M. Romano* 10 By: LINDSEY M. ROMANO Attorneys for Wellpath, LLC Defendants 11 *Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), Messrs. Logan and Little, and Ms. Romano, each consented that 12 this document be filed by CM/ECF. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, rules as 3 follows: The foregoing stipulation to consolidate the cases of A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et 4 al., No. 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO and Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT- 5 SKO pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) for pretrial dates and trial is HEREBY 6 GRANTED. 7 1. The Clerk of Court shall consolidate A.G., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al., No. 8 1:23-cv-00500-JLT-SKO and Madrid v. Sanchez-Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv- 9 00150-JLT-SKO; 10 2. All future filings and correspondence shall use Case No. 1:23-cv-00500-JLT- 11 SKO; 12 3. The Clerk shall file a copy of this order in Case No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO; 13 and 14 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to shall administratively close Madrid v. Sanchez- 15 Perez, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00150-JLT-SKO1. 16 The Court further finds that the Parties have shown good cause for the relief their 17 Stipulation requests. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference in Madrid set 18 for May 14, 2024 (Doc. 9) is VACATED and the existing Scheduling Order in A.G. (Doc. 19) 19 shall apply to the consolidated action and is modified as follows: 20 21 Matter Current Deadline (Doc. 19) New Deadline 22 Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff May 8, 2024 (W) November 6, 2024 23 Expert Disclosures June 12, 2024 (W) December 11, 2024 24 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures July 17, 2024 (W) January 15, 2025 25 Expert Discovery Cutoff August 19, 2024 (M) February 17, 2025 26
27 1 The Court notes that administratively closing this case has no impact whatsoever on the merits. 1 Non-Dispositive Motion October 16, 2024 April 9, 2025 2 Deadline-Hearing 3 Dispositive Motion Deadline- September 18, 2024 March 17, 2025 4 Filing 5 Dispositive Motion Deadline- October 28, 2024 April 21, 2025 6 Hearing 7 Deadline to Provide Proposed December 4, 2024 May 14, 2025 8 Settlement Conference Dates: 9 Pre-Trial Conference January 27, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. June 16, 2025 at 1:30 pm 10
11 Trial March 18, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. August 12, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. 12
14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: March 5, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27