G. v. New York City Department of Education
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: - 10/26/2022 S.G. individually, et al. DATE □□□ Plaintiff, . 1:22-cv-01077-MKV -against- NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDUCATION Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 23.] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by November 26, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. Me Vi feel Date: October 26, 2022 MARY Y VYSKOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G. v. New York City Department of Education (G. v. New York City Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.