G. v. C.

412 A.2d 128, 172 N.J. Super. 360, 1979 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1025
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided December 3, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this bastardy proceeding a trial in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court resulted in a dismissal in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff appealed to the then County Court and over defendant’s objection was granted a trial by jury. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant appeals and contends that the trial judge (1) erred in granting plaintiff a jury trial in contravention of R. 4:74 6, (2) committed “plain error” in not permitting certain testimony to be read back to the jury, and (3) committed “plain error” in not dismissing the complaint because the child’s blood had been completely replaced following birth because of RH complications.

With respect of defendant’s first contention we affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Callahan’s written opinion of September 12, 1978. Defendant’s remaining two contentions are clearly without merit. R. 2:11 3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. v. C., 412 A.2d 128, 172 N.J. Super. 360, 1979 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1025 (N.J. Ct. App. 1979).

412 A.2d 128 (G. v. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boston University v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
820 A.2d 1230 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2003)
State v. One 1990 Honda Accord
712 A.2d 1148 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)