G. T. Atanasio & Co. v. Societe Les Affreteurs Reunis

206 A.D. 674
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1923·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The general appearance of the defendant was equivalent to personal service of the summons only as of the date upon which the notice of appearance was served. [675]*675(See Eleventh Ward Bank v. Powers, 43 App. Div. 178.) The defendant served its answer in time, and the plaintiff wrongfully refused to accept service thereof, and wrongfully entered judgment before the time for defendant to answer had expired. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. T. Atanasio & Co. v. Societe Les Affreteurs Reunis, 206 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

206 A.D. 674 (G. T. Atanasio & Co. v. Societe Les Affreteurs Reunis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hastings Petroleum Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Hastings-on-Hudson
13 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Dyksterhouse v. Parrot
105 N.W.2d 205 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1960)
Guilford v. Brody
237 A.D. 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)