G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co.
270 F. 822, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 801
Opinion
The gist of this case is to determine what is meant by “manufacture.” The various steps taken to produce the product which was shipped to Canada, were all essential to the manufacture of the records, which were finally finished and sold in Canada. I think, within the intent and meaning of the copyright statute, the defendant manufactured the records, which are sold in Canada, in the United States. <• I agree with the result reached by the special'master and will confirm his findings.
Motion to confirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co., 270 F. 822, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 801 (S.D.N.Y. 1920).
270 F. 822 (G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leo Feist, Inc. v. Apollo Records, N. Y. Corp.
300 F. Supp. 32 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Famous Music Corporation v. Seeco Records, Inc.
201 F. Supp. 560 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Reeve Music Co., Inc. And Robbins Music Corporation v. Crest Records, Inc. And Shelley Products Ltd.
285 F.2d 546 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Reeve Music Co. v. Crest Records, Inc.
190 F. Supp. 272 (E.D. New York, 1959)
Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. Foullon
79 F. Supp. 664 (S.D. New York, 1948)