Home/S.D. New York/G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co.

G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co.

270 F. 822, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 801
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJuly 20, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 270 F. 822 (G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G. Ricordi & Co. v. Columbia Graphophone Co., 270 F. 822, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 801 (S.D.N.Y. 1920).

Opinion

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The gist of this case is to determine what is meant by “manufacture.” The various steps taken to produce the product which was shipped to Canada, were all essential to the manufacture of the records, which were finally finished and sold in Canada. I think, within the intent and meaning of the copyright statute, the defendant manufactured the records, which are sold in Canada, in the United States. <• I agree with the result reached by the special'master and will confirm his findings.

Motion to confirm granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leo Feist, Inc. v. Apollo Records, N. Y. Corp.
300 F. Supp. 32 (S.D. New York, 1969)
Famous Music Corporation v. Seeco Records, Inc.
201 F. Supp. 560 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Reeve Music Co., Inc. And Robbins Music Corporation v. Crest Records, Inc. And Shelley Products Ltd.
285 F.2d 546 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Reeve Music Co. v. Crest Records, Inc.
190 F. Supp. 272 (E.D. New York, 1959)
Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. Foullon
79 F. Supp. 664 (S.D. New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 F. 822, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-ricordi-co-v-columbia-graphophone-co-nysd-1920.