G. R. Crusen, L. F. Gunderson, and L. G. Van Lehn v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Tenth Circuit

G. R. Crusen, L. F. Gunderson, and L. G. Van Lehn v. United Air Lines, Inc.

239 F.2d 863, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2282, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedDecember 24, 1956

Docket5434

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 239 F.2d 863 (G. R. Crusen, L. F. Gunderson, and L. G. Van Lehn v. United Air Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G. R. Crusen, L. F. Gunderson, and L. G. Van Lehn v. United Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.2d 863, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2282, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240 (10th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court of Colorado challenging the dismissal of appellants’ complaint seeking a declaration of pilots’ seniority rights under a collective bargaining agreement.

The dismissal is based upon a finding that the appellants had not exhausted their administrative remedies by failing to file a timely appeal with the United Air Line Pilots System Board of Adjustment, established under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 184.

The facts are well stated in the memorandum opinion and order of the trial court. See D.C., 141 F.Supp. 347. We agree with the trial court’s opinion and its judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court of Colorado challenging the dismissal of appellants’ complaint seeking a declaration of pilots’ seniority rights under a collective bargaining agreement.

The dismissal is based upon a finding that the appellants had not exhausted their administrative remedies by failing to file a timely appeal with the United Air Line Pilots System Board of Adjustment, established under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 184.

The facts are well stated in the memorandum opinion and order of the trial court. See D.C., 141 F.Supp. 347. We agree with the trial court’s opinion and its judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 F.2d 863, 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2282, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-r-crusen-l-f-gunderson-and-l-g-van-lehn-v-united-air-lines-inc-ca10-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack