G & L Motor Corp. v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Florida

G & L Motor Corp. v. Taylor

207 So. 2d 274

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in G & L Motor Corp. v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3885 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 21, 1968·No. No. 36840·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent is granted in the sum of $250.-00.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, C. J., and ADAMS, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent is granted in the sum of $250.-00.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, C. J., and ADAMS, J., dissent.

G & L Motor Corp. v. Taylor, 207 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

207 So. 2d 274 (G & L Motor Corp. v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.