G. H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Morris

1 White & W. 427
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 1881
DocketNo. 1062, Op. Book No. 2, p. 314
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 427 (G. H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G. H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. Morris, 1 White & W. 427 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 777. Account; meaning of, as used in art. 2266, Rev. Slat. This suit was brought by appellee against appellant on an account for injuries and damages amounting to $172.50, occasioned to appellee’s property by the acts of appellant. The account was verified by appellee’s affidavit in accordance with article 2263 o£ the Revised Statutes, and on the trial of the case appellee was permitted, over appellant’s objection, to read the account in evidence, and no other evidence except the account was adduced by appellee, and upon this evidence alone judgment was rendered in his favor for the full amount of his claim. Held: The cause of action was a tort, and not the subject of an account within the meaning of the above cited provision of the statute. The plaintiff’s affidavit added nothing to its force or weight as evidence, and did not dispense with proving it aliunde. In and of itself, it did not make out-a prima facie case, or in fact any case. [H. & T. C. R’y Co. v. Hays & Co. ante, p. 416.] The judgment of the court below is without evidence to support it.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-h-s-a-ry-co-v-morris-texapp-1881.