G. H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. Enns Milling Co.
84 P.2d 940, 148 Kan. 737, 1938 Kan. LEXIS 259, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1203
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The appeal in this case is from the order and judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. The appeal involves the same questions presented in the case of G. S. [738]*738Johnson Co. v. N. Sauer Milling Co., this day decided. See post, p. 861. For the reasons therein stated, we hold the petition herein fails to state a cause of action.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G. H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. Enns Milling Co., 84 P.2d 940, 148 Kan. 737, 1938 Kan. LEXIS 259, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1203 (kan 1938).
84 P.2d 940 (G. H. Leidenheimer Baking Co. v. Enns Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Biscuit Co. v. Lloyd
6 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1940)