G. & H. Building Corp. v. City of New York

202 A.D. 814
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 202 A.D. 814 (G. & H. Building Corp. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G. & H. Building Corp. v. City of New York, 202 A.D. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Application for injunction pending appeal from order denied, without costs. We do not doubt the power of the court to enjoin the contemplated action of the board of estimate and apportionment. But such power should not be exercised unless it clearly appears that plaintiff’s rights will be irreparably injured by the mere passage of the resolution. If the facts be as [815]*815contended by the plaintiff, that the final permit was properly issued and has been illegally revoked, and that plaintiff has paid out money and incurred obligations pursuant to permission heretofore granted, it cannot be deprived of a vested private right by any contemplated action of the board of estimate. (City of Buffalo v. Chadeayne, 134 N. Y. 163.) The power of the superintendent of buildings to revoke permits is governed by subdivision 7 of section 4 of the Building Code,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ABM Builders, Inc. v. Gribetz
49 Misc. 2d 1053 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
Rixford Manufacturing Co. v. Town of Highgate
144 A. 680 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1929)
Ohlau v. Kleinert
121 Misc. 386 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D. 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-h-building-corp-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1922.