G. Goldberg & Sons, Inc. v. Weisberg-Goldman Corp.

185 N.E. 727, 261 N.Y. 535, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1346
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions for reargument are denied. The motions to amend the remittitur are granted; return of remittitur is requested and when returned it will be amended so as to read in the portion applicable to the defendant Title Guarantee and Trust Company as follows: Judgment of the lower court as to Title Guarantee and Trust Company modified by striking therefrom the provision awarding personal judgment against the appellant, Title Guarantee and Trust Company, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party in this court and in the courts below;” and it will also be amended as requested by the defendant WeisbergGoldman Corporation by striking therefrom the words cannot be delivered ” and inserting therein the words is not delivered.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. Goldberg & Sons, Inc. v. Weisberg-Goldman Corp., 185 N.E. 727, 261 N.Y. 535, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1346 (N.Y. 1933).

185 N.E. 727 (G. Goldberg & Sons, Inc. v. Weisberg-Goldman Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gottfried v. State
23 Misc. 2d 733 (New York State Court of Claims, 1960)