G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Arturo Flores

Opinion

1 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. 2 First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue 3 South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227

4 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 5 TPRLAW@att.net

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC

7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FRESNO DIVISION 9

10 G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC, CASE NO. 1:18-cv-01248-LJO-JLT

11 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

12 vs. 13 ARTURO FLORES, et al, 14

15 Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, 18 LLC, and Defendants Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez that the above-entitled action is hereby 19 20 dismissed without prejudice against Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez. 21 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a 22 motion to reopen this action by February 1, 2020, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with 23 24 prejudice. 25 This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each Party 26 referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 27 /// 28 2 Because the parties have stipulated to close this action, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 3 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties 4 who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” 5 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is 6 DIRECTED to close this action. 7

8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: November 7, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28