G. D. Witt Shoe Co. v. Bordeaux

Supreme Court of Georgia

G. D. Witt Shoe Co. v. Bordeaux

25 S.E. 38, 99 Ga. 144

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 38 (G. D. Witt Shoe Co. v. Bordeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G. D. Witt Shoe Co. v. Bordeaux, 25 S.E. 38, 99 Ga. 144 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

This court cannot undertake to determine whether or not there wais an abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an injunction and appoint a receiver, when there has been a total disregard of the law as to the method of bringing evidence to this court, the document purporting to be a brief of the same consisting of numerous deeds, affidavits, itemized accounts and other papers, none of which are in any manner abbreviated, and many of which are manifestly useless for the purpose of reviewing the judgment sought to be reversed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

This court cannot undertake to determine whether or not there wais an abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an injunction and appoint a receiver, when there has been a total disregard of the law as to the method of bringing evidence to this court, the document purporting to be a brief of the same consisting of numerous deeds, affidavits, itemized accounts and other papers, none of which are in any manner abbreviated, and many of which are manifestly useless for the purpose of reviewing the judgment sought to be reversed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.E. 38, 99 Ga. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-d-witt-shoe-co-v-bordeaux-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack