G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Bell

4 Willson 181
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 1890
DocketNo. 6530
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Willson 181 (G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Bell, 4 Willson 181 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 119. Statement of facts; when stricken out on appeal, not ground for reversal. At the last term of this court the statement of facts contained in the record was stricken out upon motion of appellee because not properly authenticated by the trial judge. Appellant now moves to reverse the judgment for the alleged reason that he has been deprived of a statement of facts without fault on his part. This motion is not maintainable, and is overruled. [Sayles’ Civil St., art. 1379a; Collins v. Kay, 69 Tex. 366; Railway Co. v. Underwood, 67 Tex. 594.] In the absence of a statement of facts, none of the assignments of error can be determined, and the judgment is . ^

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International & Great Northern Railroad v. Underwood
4 S.W. 216 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)
Collins v. Kay
6 S.W. 313 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Willson 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-c-s-f-ry-co-v-bell-texapp-1890.