G & C Ford Co. v. Toner
263 So. 2d 214, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3599
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and the writ of certiorari issued. After argument and upon further examination of the record and briefs in this case, we conclude that there is no conflict justifying the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court. Therefore, the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed and the writ is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G & C Ford Co. v. Toner, 263 So. 2d 214, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3599 (Fla. 1972).
263 So. 2d 214 (G & C Ford Co. v. Toner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Almon
559 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Almon v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
537 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS v. Clauson
511 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Devlin v. Florida Rent-A-Car, Inc.
454 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)