Home/Supreme Court of Florida/G & C Ford Co. v. Toner

G & C Ford Co. v. Toner

263 So. 2d 214, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3599
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1972
DocketNo. 41413
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 263 So. 2d 214 (G & C Ford Co. v. Toner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G & C Ford Co. v. Toner, 263 So. 2d 214, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3599 (Fla. 1972).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and the writ of certiorari issued. After argument and upon further examination of the record and briefs in this case, we conclude that there is no conflict justifying the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court. Therefore, the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed and the writ is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J., dissents. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion. CARLTON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Almon
559 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Almon v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
537 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS v. Clauson
511 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Devlin v. Florida Rent-A-Car, Inc.
454 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 2d 214, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-c-ford-co-v-toner-fla-1972.