G. B. Zigler Company v. Russell C. Nunez, Russell C. Nunez v. G. B. Zigler Co.

Fifth Circuit

G. B. Zigler Company v. Russell C. Nunez, Russell C. Nunez v. G. B. Zigler Co.

330 F.2d 959

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1964

Docket21185_1

StatusPublished

This text of 330 F.2d 959 (G. B. Zigler Company v. Russell C. Nunez, Russell C. Nunez v. G. B. Zigler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G. B. Zigler Company v. Russell C. Nunez, Russell C. Nunez v. G. B. Zigler Co., 330 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought in the court below by crew members of two vessels seeking an award for salvage services. At the conclusion of the trial, the court below made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and made an award in favor of libelants. Both sides appealed; respondents in the court below contending here that the court erred as a matter of law in making an excessive award, and libelants contending that the award was inadequate. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs, and oral arguments and conclude that all of the grounds of appeal are without merit. The costs of appeal are taxed against G. B. Zigler Company, the Barge Z-120, and Gulf Oil Corporation, respondents in the court below.

The judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought in the court below by crew members of two vessels seeking an award for salvage services. At the conclusion of the trial, the court below made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and made an award in favor of libelants. Both sides appealed; respondents in the court below contending here that the court erred as a matter of law in making an excessive award, and libelants contending that the award was inadequate. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs, and oral arguments and conclude that all of the grounds of appeal are without merit. The costs of appeal are taxed against G. B. Zigler Company, the Barge Z-120, and Gulf Oil Corporation, respondents in the court below.

The judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-b-zigler-company-v-russell-c-nunez-russell-c-nunez-v-g-b-zigler-ca5-1964.