G & B Equipment, Inc. v. Miller

466 So. 2d 437, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13309
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1985·No. No. AY-416·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, we affirm all issues but one. We reverse that part of the order requiring the employer/carrier to pay Miller's adult daughter $550 per week for constant attendant care from 25 August 1982 to the date of the order.

There is no competent substantial evidence in the record that Miller was provided constant compensable attendant care during the period in question. Miller, therefore, did not bear his burden of proving by competent substantial evidence the quantity, quality, and duration of attendant services claimed. Walt Disney World Co. v. Harrison, 443 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

This holding does not affect Miller’s daughter’s entitlement to $200 per week for the period in question, payable pursuant to an earlier order dated 5 August 1981.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G & B Equipment, Inc. v. Miller, 466 So. 2d 437, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 895, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13309 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

466 So. 2d 437 (G & B Equipment, Inc. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates
504 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Hayward Trucking v. Aetna Ins. Co.
466 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)