FX Funding LLC v. Fox RX Inc.

2021 NY Slip Op 05774, 152 N.Y.S.3d 818, 198 A.D.3d 530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 2021
DocketIndex No. 665779/16 Appeal No. 14422 Case No. 2021-00643
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05774 (FX Funding LLC v. Fox RX Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FX Funding LLC v. Fox RX Inc., 2021 NY Slip Op 05774, 152 N.Y.S.3d 818, 198 A.D.3d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

FX Funding LLC v Fox RX Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 05774)
FX Funding LLC v Fox RX Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 05774
Decided on October 21, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 21, 2021
Before: Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Kern, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

Index No. 665779/16 Appeal No. 14422 Case No. 2021-00643

[*1]FX Funding LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Fox RX Inc., et al, Defendants-Appellants.


Law Office of Harriette N. Boxer, Bayshore (Harriette N. Boxer of counsel), for appellants.

Law Office of Sheldon H. Gopstein, New York (Sheldon H. Gopstein of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2021, to the extent it ordered that discovery would not be stayed pending dispositive motions, unanimously dismissed, with costs, as academic.

Supreme Court having decided the only dispositive motion pending when defendants sought the stay, i.e., a motion to dismiss the complaint as against the individual defendants, by order entered July 2, 2021, the order on appeal is presently moot (see E-Z Eating 41 Corp. v H.E. Newport L.L.C., 84 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2011]). No exception to the mootness doctrine applies (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 21, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
E-Z Eating 41 Corp. v. H.E. Newport L.L.C.
84 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 05774, 152 N.Y.S.3d 818, 198 A.D.3d 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fx-funding-llc-v-fox-rx-inc-nyappdiv-2021.