Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc.

Fifth Circuit

Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc.

896 F.2d 864, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1990

Docket86-1723

StatusPublished

This text of 896 F.2d 864 (Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc., 896 F.2d 864, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3153 (5th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

896 F.2d 864

FW/PBS, INC., Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
John Randall DUMAS d/b/a Geno's, Plaintiff,
Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., Defendant-Appellee.
Calvin BERRY, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1723.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1990.

Malcolm Dade, Dallas, Tex., for FW/PBS.

Arthur M. Schwartz, Denver, Colo., for FW/PBS, et al.

Frank P. Hernandez, Dallas, Tex., for Calvin Berry, III, et al.

Richard L. Wilson, Orlando, Fla., for Tamers, et al.

David LaBrec, Office of the City Atty., Vol Villasana, Mark O'Briant, Tom Brandt, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Bruce A. Taylor, Phoenix, Ariz., for amicus--Citizens for Decency Through Law, Inc.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Jerry Buchmeyer, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before THORNBERRY, GARWOOD and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Our decision affirming the district court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part by the United States Supreme Court and remanded to this court. --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 596, 107 L.Ed.2d 603. We remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI