Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad
233 F.2d 875
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 28, 1956·No. No. 357, Docket 23098·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The order is clearly interlocutory and not appealable. Whether or not the New Jersey two-year Statute of Limitations, Title 48:12-151, New Jersey Revised Statutes, is applicable has hot been decided nor has the case been tried on the merits. All that is before us is an order granting defendant leave to file an amended answer.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 233 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1956).
233 F.2d 875 (Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Fuzia, an Infant by His Guardian Ad Litem Katie Rodenak and Julius Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
233 F.2d 875 (Second Circuit, 1956)