Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad
233 F.2d 875
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 1956
DocketNo. 357, Docket 23098
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 233 F.2d 875 (Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 233 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1956).
Opinion
The order is clearly interlocutory and not appealable. Whether or not the New Jersey two-year Statute of Limitations, Title 48:12-151, New Jersey Revised Statutes, is applicable has hot been decided nor has the case been tried on the merits. All that is before us is an order granting defendant leave to file an amended answer.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Joseph Fuzia, an Infant by His Guardian Ad Litem Katie Rodenak and Julius Fuzia v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
233 F.2d 875 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 F.2d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuzia-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ca2-1956.