Futurelogic, Inc. v. Nanoptix, Inc.
This text of Futurelogic, Inc. v. Nanoptix, Inc. (Futurelogic, Inc. v. Nanoptix, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
FUTURELOGIC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
NANOPTIX, INC., Defenclant-Cross Appellant.
2012-1095, -1136 .
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. l0-CV-7678, Judge John F. Wa1ter.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Nanoptix, Inc. (“Nanoptix”) moves to strike portions of FutureLogic, Inc.’s ("FutureLogic”) Yellow Brief, asserting that those portions include new arguments and positions not raised in FutureLogic’s Blue Brief. FutureLogic
opposes. Nanoptix replies.
Upon consideration thereof,
FUTURELoGIC v. NANoPTIX 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear the case.
(2) The parties are directed to file three additional copies of the motion, opposition, and reply within 10 days of the date of filing of this order. Those copies shall be transmitted to the merits panel along with a copy of this order.
FOR THE CoURT
JUL 3 "9 ?912 /S/ Jan H@rbaiy Date J an Horbaly Clerk `
oc: Brett J. Williamson, Esq. Michael D. Rounds, Esq.
FDH 325 “»'-a‘im§§ll=~\m..i.~..,t
JUL 30 2012 JANHOHBALY CLEHK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Futurelogic, Inc. v. Nanoptix, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futurelogic-inc-v-nanoptix-inc-cafc-2012.