Futterman v. Bally's Park Place Hotel & Casino, Inc.

257 A.D.2d 469, 682 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437

This text of 257 A.D.2d 469 (Futterman v. Bally's Park Place Hotel & Casino, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Futterman v. Bally's Park Place Hotel & Casino, Inc., 257 A.D.2d 469, 682 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered September 9, 1997, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to restore their case to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion to restore this action commenced in August 1993 and dismissed as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404 in May 1996 was properly denied since plaintiffs failed sufficiently to demonstrate any of the essential requisites for restoration (see, Almanzar v Rye Ridge Realty Co., 249 AD2d 128). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almanzar v. Rye Ridge Realty Co.
249 A.D.2d 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D.2d 469, 682 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futterman-v-ballys-park-place-hotel-casino-inc-nyappdiv-1999.