Futter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Futter v. State

831 So. 2d 1233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18093, 2002 WL 31769253

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 11, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-4589

StatusPublished

This text of 831 So. 2d 1233 (Futter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Futter v. State, 831 So. 2d 1233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18093, 2002 WL 31769253 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

We affirm without comment the trial court’s revocation of Mark Futter’s community control pursuant to its finding that Futter violated conditions 12 and 31 of his community control. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the typographical error in its Order of Revocation of Community Control rendered April 18, 2002, that erroneously referred to condition 13 instead of 31.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SILBERMAN, Judge.

We affirm without comment the trial court’s revocation of Mark Futter’s community control pursuant to its finding that Futter violated conditions 12 and 31 of his community control. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the typographical error in its Order of Revocation of Community Control rendered April 18, 2002, that erroneously referred to condition 13 instead of 31.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

831 So. 2d 1233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18093, 2002 WL 31769253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futter-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.