Futrelle v. Karsman

150 S.E. 94, 169 Ga. 371, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 360
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 19, 1929·No. No. 7323·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Prom an inspection of the bill of exceptions and tlie record in tbis case it appears that the action, though denominated an equitable action, is one at law, and is a case of which, under the constitution of this State, the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction. Accordingly the case will be

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Frederick A. Tulen, for plaintiff. Girard M. Cohen, Columbus E. Alexander, and Myer Cherkas, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Futrelle v. Karsman, 150 S.E. 94, 169 Ga. 371, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 360 (Ga. 1929).

150 S.E. 94 (Futrelle v. Karsman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Soya Co. v. Bundrick
214 S.E.2d 556 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Martin v. Home Owners Loan Corporation
31 S.E.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)