Futrelle v. Karsman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Futrelle v. Karsman

150 S.E. 94, 169 Ga. 371, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 360

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 19, 1929

DocketNo. 7323

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 150 S.E. 94 (Futrelle v. Karsman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Futrelle v. Karsman, 150 S.E. 94, 169 Ga. 371, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 360 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Prom an inspection of the bill of exceptions and tlie record in tbis case it appears that the action, though denominated an equitable action, is one at law, and is a case of which, under the constitution of this State, the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction. Accordingly the case will be

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Frederick A. Tulen, for plaintiff. Girard M. Cohen, Columbus E. Alexander, and Myer Cherkas, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

Prom an inspection of the bill of exceptions and tlie record in tbis case it appears that the action, though denominated an equitable action, is one at law, and is a case of which, under the constitution of this State, the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction. Accordingly the case will be

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Frederick A. Tulen, for plaintiff. Girard M. Cohen, Columbus E. Alexander, and Myer Cherkas, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 94, 169 Ga. 371, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futrelle-v-karsman-ga-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack