Futrell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Futrell v. State

260 S.W.3d 432, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2008 WL 3843339

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 19, 2008

DocketED 90100

StatusPublished

This text of 260 S.W.3d 432 (Futrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Futrell v. State, 260 S.W.3d 432, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2008 WL 3843339 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Montrell Futrell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Montrell Futrell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 S.W.3d 432, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2008 WL 3843339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futrell-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack