Futrell v. State
This text of 402 So. 2d 29 (Futrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant is correct in his position that because he is a juvenile he was entitled to be sentenced under the procedures specified in section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1979), which requires, among other things, the pri- or receipt and consideration of a predisposition report, notwithstanding the fact that his prosecution was initiated by direct information. See Austin v. State, 400 So.2d 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The sentences are therefore vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to resentence the defendant in accordance with the cited statute.
Sentence VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 So. 2d 29, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futrell-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.