Futrell v. Deanes

116 N.C. 38
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Eairoloth, C. J.:

It appears from tbe record that tbe only question was which party should pay tbe costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. State v. Railroad, 74 N. C., 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N. C., 93.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Futrell v. Deanes, 116 N.C. 38 (N.C. 1895).

116 N.C. 38 (Futrell v. Deanes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

VanDyke v. Ætna Life Insurance
93 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)