Futherer v. Angelidis

261 A.D. 876, 25 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 876 (Futherer v. Angelidis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Futherer v. Angelidis, 261 A.D. 876, 25 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the twenty-year, and not the six-year, Statute of Limitations applies to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 47, 48; Atlantic Dock Co. v. Leavitt, 54 N. Y. 35; Bowen v. Beck, 94 id. 86; Hyde v. Miller, 45 App. Div. 396; Quackenbush v. Mapes, No. 1, 123 id. 242; Hulbert v. Clark, 57 Hun, 558; affd., 128 N. Y. 295; Greenly v. Greenly, 114 App. Div. 640; Anguish v. Blair, 160 id. 52; affd., 216 N. Y. 746.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover installments of interest on a bond secured by a second mortgage.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ernst v. Schaack
271 A.D.2d 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Eyeington v. Pardee
184 Misc. 803 (New York County Courts, 1945)
Onondaga County Savings Bank v. Markson Bros.
182 Misc. 954 (New York County Courts, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 876, 25 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futherer-v-angelidis-nyappdiv-1941.