Futersak v. F.C.P. Contractors, Inc.

187 A.D.2d 513, 590 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695

This text of 187 A.D.2d 513 (Futersak v. F.C.P. Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Futersak v. F.C.P. Contractors, Inc., 187 A.D.2d 513, 590 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, the appeals are from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated September 17, 1990, and November 1, 1990, respectively, and a judgment of the same court, entered November 27,1990.

Ordered that the appeals from the orders are dismissed (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice McCaffrey at the Supreme Court, in the orders dated September 17, 1990, and November 1, 1990; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioners are awarded one bill of costs. Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 513, 590 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futersak-v-fcp-contractors-inc-nyappdiv-1992.