Futch v. Taylor

105 S.E. 616, 26 Ga. App. 129, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 20
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Futch v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ga. App. 441
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1921·No. 11548·Published

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. In a suit upon a statutory bond required under the Civil Code (1910), § 6040, given for the delivery of personal property levied on at the time and place of sale in the event that an affidavit of illegality which has been filed to the execution shall be dismissed or withdrawn, it is necessary for the plaintiff to prove what disposition was made of the affidavit of illegality, and the amount of the judgment upon which the execution issued. There being no evidence in this case to establish these facts, a verdict directed for the plaintiff was contrary to law. Civil Code (1910), § 6040; Doyal v. Johns, 90 Ga. 188 (15 S. E. 776).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Hill, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Futch v. Taylor, 105 S.E. 616, 26 Ga. App. 129, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

105 S.E. 616 (Futch v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doyal v. Johns
15 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)