Futch v. State
This text of 399 So. 2d 533 (Futch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a conviction based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree murder and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.
[534]*534It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence photographs of the deceased alleged to be irrelevant and prejudicial.
We have carefully considered the point on appeal in the light of the record and briefs and have concluded that reversible error has not been shown. Mack v. State, 346 So.2d 1229 (Fla., 3d DCA 1977).
Therefore the judgment and sentences are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 So. 2d 533, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futch-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.