Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

158 So. 2d 455, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2123
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 1, 1963
DocketNo. 10010
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 158 So. 2d 455 (Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 158 So. 2d 455, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2123 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

The facts and the law have been discussed in the cases of Tucker, La.App., 158 So. 2d 453, and Stuckey, La.App., 158 So.2d 454, against this defendant.

The instant case presents an appeal by defendant from a judgment in the principal sum of $1,193.70 in favor of plaintiff. This amount represents the evaluation of the district judge over and above the prorated liability of the primary insurer for compensatory damages, and we find no error in the judgment.

Accordingly, it follows that the judgment appealed from should be and is affirmed at the cost of defendant-appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company
166 So. 2d 274 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)
Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
160 So. 2d 230 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)
Tucker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
158 So. 2d 453 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Stuckey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
158 So. 2d 454 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 2d 455, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/futch-v-fidelity-casualty-co-of-new-york-lactapp-1963.