Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

158 So. 2d 455, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2123
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 1, 1963·No. No. 10010·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

The facts and the law have been discussed in the cases of Tucker, La.App., 158 So. 2d 453, and Stuckey, La.App., 158 So.2d 454, against this defendant.

The instant case presents an appeal by defendant from a judgment in the principal sum of $1,193.70 in favor of plaintiff. This amount represents the evaluation of the district judge over and above the prorated liability of the primary insurer for compensatory damages, and we find no error in the judgment.

Accordingly, it follows that the judgment appealed from should be and is affirmed at the cost of defendant-appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 158 So. 2d 455, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2123 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

158 So. 2d 455 (Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company
166 So. 2d 274 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)
Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
160 So. 2d 230 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964)
Tucker v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
158 So. 2d 453 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Stuckey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
158 So. 2d 454 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)