Fussell v. State
This text of 436 So. 2d 434 (Fussell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Donnie FUSSELL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*435 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kathleen G. Gallagher, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Penny Hershoff Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
During voir dire examination, the prosecutor asked a prospective juror, "Does it bother you that a 14 year old girl is going to be the victim in this case, it is going to be her word against his word?" While the question generally represented the projected evidence in the case, (which consisted of the victim's testimony pitted against that of the defendant's admissible confession) the question nonetheless constituted a comment upon the defendant's failure to testify in his own behalf. Smith v. State, 358 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA), dismissed, 364 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1978).
For this reason, the defendant's conviction of attempted sexual battery is reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 So. 2d 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fussell-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.