Fussell v. Stalder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fussell v. Stalder. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 F.3d 156
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-30840·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30840 Conference Calendar __________________

JEFFERY FUSSELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary of Corrections, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. CA-94-891-A-M2 ----------------------

February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery Fussell has filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He appeals from the trial court's

denial of his motion for the appointment of counsel.

Fussell has not demonstrated that this case is so

exceptional as to require the appointment of counsel. There is,

therefore, no abuse of discretion by the district court in not

appointing counsel.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-30840 -2-

Fussell has not presented a nonfrivolous issue. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that his motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP

is DENIED. Because his appeal is frivolous, the appeal is

DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fussell v. Stalder, (5th Cir. 1996).

Fussell v. Stalder (Fussell v. Stalder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.