Fussell v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU
This text of 684 S.E.2d 888 (Fussell v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Milton K. FUSSELL and Teresa Fussell, Plaintiffs
v.
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU, Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., Pacesetters Realty, Inc. of Wake County, the Town of Apex, and Thomas Cooper, Defendants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Michael S. Harrell, Raleigh, for Milton K. Fussell, et al.
Cathryn M. Little, Raleigh, for Town of Apex.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 680 S.E.2d 229.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 4th of September 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is
*889 Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of October 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 S.E.2d 888, 2009 WL 3329531, 363 N.C. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fussell-v-north-carolina-farm-bureau-nc-2009.